[en] Based on an operational 2D shallow-water model, the Authors computed subcritical dividing
flow at a three-branch crossroad, considering obstacles located at different positions. The
numerical predictions were compared to observations from Mignot et al. (2013). Two issues
are addressed here, related respectively to the efficiency and relevance of the turbulence
model, and to the representation of the obstacles in operational flood models.
Disciplines :
Civil engineering
Author, co-author :
Bruwier, Martin ; Université de Liège > Département ArGEnCo > Hydraulics in Environmental and Civil Engineering
Erpicum, Sébastien ; Université de Liège > Scientifiques attachés au Doyen (Sc.appliquées)
Archambeau, Pierre ; Université de Liège > Département ArGEnCo > HECE (Hydraulics in Environnemental and Civil Engineering)
Pirotton, Michel ; Université de Liège > Département ArGEnCo > HECE (Hydraulics in Environnemental and Civil Engineering)
Dewals, Benjamin ; Université de Liège > Département ArGEnCo > Hydraulics in Environmental and Civil Engineering
Language :
English
Title :
Computing flooding of crossroads with obstacles using a 2D numerical model (Discussion)
Publication date :
2017
Journal title :
Journal of Hydraulic Research
ISSN :
0022-1686
eISSN :
1814-2079
Publisher :
International Association for Hydraulic Research, Delft, Netherlands
Arrault, A., Finaud-Guyot, P., Archambeau, P., Bruwier, M., Erpicum, S., Pirotton, M., & Dewals, B., (2016). Hydrodynamics of long-duration urban floods:Experiments and numerical modelling. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(6), 1413–1429. doi:10.5194/nhess-16-1413-2016
Bazin, P.-H., Mignot, E., & Paquier, A., (2016). Computing flooding of crossroads with obstacles using a 2D numerical model. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 55(1), 1–13.
Causon, D. M., Ingram, D., & Mingham, C. G., (2001). A Cartesian cut cell method for shallow water flows with moving boundaries. Advances in Water Resources, 24(8), 899–911. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00010-0
Causon, D. M., Ingram, D., Mingham, C. G., Yang, G., & Pearson, R. V., (2000). Calculation of shallow water flows using a Cartesian cut cell approach. Advances in Water Resources, 23(5), 545–562. doi:10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00036-6
Chen, A. S., Evans, B., Djordjević, S., & Savić, D. A., (2012). A coarse-grid approach to representing building blockage effects in 2D urban flood modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 426, 1–16.
Dottori, F., Di Baldassarre, G., & Todini, E., (2013). Detailed data is welcome, but with a pinch of salt:Accuracy, precision, and uncertainty in flood inundation modeling. Water Resources Research, 49(9), 6079–6085. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20406
Kim, B., Sanders, B. F., Famiglietti, J. S., & Guinot, V., (2015). Urban flood modeling with porous shallow-water equations:A case study of model errors in the presence of anisotropic porosity. Journal of Hydrology, 523, 680–692. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.059
Kim, B., Sanders, B. F., Schubert, J. E., & Famiglietti, J. S., (2014). Mesh type tradeoffs in 2D hydrodynamic modeling of flooding with a Godunov-based flow solver. Advances in Water Resources, 68, 42–61. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.02.013
Mignot, E., Zeng, C., Dominguez, G., Li, C.-W., Rivière, N., & Bazin, P.-H., (2013). Impact of topographic obstacles on the discharge distribution in open-channel bifurcations. Journal of Hydrology, 494, 10–19. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.023
Munson, B. R., Young, D. F., & Okiishi, T. H., (2006). Fundamentals of fluid mechanics (5th ed.). New York:John Wiley & Sons.
Özgen, I., Zhao, J., Liang, D., & Hinkelmann, R., (2016). Urban flood modeling using shallow water equations with depth-dependent anisotropic porosity. Journal of Hydrology, 541, 1165–1184. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.025
Sanders, B. F., Schubert, J. E., & Gallegos, H. A., (2008). Integral formulation of shallow-water equations with anisotropic porosity for urban flood modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 362, 19–38. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.08.009
Schubert, J. E., & Sanders, B. F., (2012). Building treatments for urban flood inundation models and implications for predictive skill and modeling efficiency. Advances in Water Resources, 41, 49–64. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.012
